2009 Session - Senate Journals

The prayer was offered by the Chaplain, Bishop Deb Kiesey, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Senate pages Erin Schoenbeck and McKenzie Jones.

Roll Call: All members present.

APPROVAL OF THE JOURNAL

MR. PRESIDENT:

The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that the Secretary of the Senate has had under consideration the Senate Journal of the ninth day.

All errors, typographical or otherwise, are duly marked in the temporary journal for correction.

And we hereby move the adoption of the report.

Respectfully submitted,

Bob Gray, Chair

Which motion prevailed.

CONSIDERATION OF EXECUTIVE APPOINTMENTS

The Senate proceeded to the consideration of the executive reappointment of Judy Greff of Beadle County, Huron, South Dakota, to the Career Service Commission.

The question being "Does the Senate advise and consent to the executive reappointment of Judy Greff pursuant to the executive message as found on page 43 of the Senate Journal?"

And the roll being called:

Yeas 34, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent 0

Yeas:
Abdallah; Ahlers; Bartling; Bradford; Brown; Dempster; Fryslie; Gant; Garnos; Gillespie; Gray; Hansen (Tom); Hanson (Gary); Haverly; Heidepriem; Howie; Hundstad; Hunhoff (Jean); Jerstad; Kloucek; Knudson; Maher; Merchant; Miles; Nelson; Nesselhuf; Novstrup (Al); Olson (Russell); Peterson; Rhoden; Schmidt; Tieszen; Turbak Berry; Vehle

Excused:
Adelstein

So the question having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the President declared the reappointment confirmed.

The Senate proceeded to the consideration of the executive appointment of Bruce Rampelberg of Pennington County, Rapid City, South Dakota, to the Housing Development Authority.

The question being "Does the Senate advise and consent to the executive appointment of Bruce Rampelberg pursuant to the executive message as found on page 47 of the Senate Journal?"

And the roll being called:

Yeas 34, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent 0

Yeas:
Abdallah; Adelstein; Ahlers; Bartling; Bradford; Brown; Dempster; Fryslie; Gant; Garnos; Gillespie; Gray; Hansen (Tom); Hanson (Gary); Haverly; Heidepriem; Howie; Hundstad; Hunhoff (Jean); Jerstad; Kloucek; Knudson; Maher; Merchant; Miles; Nelson; Novstrup (Al); Olson (Russell); Peterson; Rhoden; Schmidt; Tieszen; Turbak Berry; Vehle

Excused:
Nesselhuf

So the question having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the President declared the appointment confirmed.

The Senate proceeded to the consideration of the executive reappointment of Curt Jones of Marshall County, Britton, South Dakota, to the Housing Development Authority.

The question being "Does the Senate advise and consent to the executive reappointment of Curt Jones pursuant to the executive message as found on page 46 of the Senate Journal?"

And the roll being called:

Yeas 34, Nays 0, Excused 1, Absent 0

Yeas:
Abdallah; Adelstein; Ahlers; Bartling; Bradford; Brown; Dempster; Fryslie; Gant; Garnos; Gillespie; Gray; Hansen (Tom); Hanson (Gary); Haverly; Heidepriem; Howie; Hundstad; Hunhoff (Jean); Jerstad; Knudson; Maher; Merchant; Miles; Nelson; Nesselhuf; Novstrup (Al); Olson (Russell); Peterson; Rhoden; Schmidt; Tieszen; Turbak Berry; Vehle

Excused:
Kloucek

So the question having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the President declared the reappointment confirmed.

REPORTS OF STANDING COMMITTEES

MR. PRESIDENT:

The Committee on Education respectfully reports that it has had under consideration SB 38 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:

38ca

On page 1, line 7, of the printed bill, delete everything after "requirement" and insert "for any proposed school district if the secretary deems it appropriate after considering the following factors:

(1) The academic program opportunities that would be available to students in the proposed school district in comparison to the academic program opportunities that would be available to those students under other proposals;

(2) The buildings and equipment that exist in the proposed school district;

(3) The economic viability of the proposed school district;

(4) The natural community areas that exist within the confines of the proposed school district;

(5) Transportation issues relative to the proposed school district;

(6) The variety of activities that would be available to students in the proposed school district;

(7) Student enrollment projections for the proposed school district; and

(8) Property valuations and other taxation issues relative to the proposed school district."

And that as so amended said bill do pass.

Also MR. PRESIDENT:

The Committee on Education respectfully reports that it has had under consideration the nomination of Kelly Duncan of Union County, Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, to the South Dakota Board of Education and returns the same with the recommendation that the Senate advise and consent to the confirmation of said reappointment.

Also MR. PRESIDENT:

The Committee on Education respectfully reports that it has had under consideration the nomination of Melanie J. Satchell of Pennington County, Rapid City, South Dakota, to the State Board of Regents and returns the same with the recommendation that the Senate advise and consent to the confirmation of said appointment.

Respectfully submitted,
Cooper Garnos, Chair

Also MR. PRESIDENT:

The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration SB 37, 70, and 78 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bills do pass.

Also MR. PRESIDENT:

The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration HB 1015, 1016, and 1017 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bills do pass and be placed on the consent calendar.

Respectfully submitted,
Gene G. Abdallah, Chair

Also MR. PRESIDENT:

The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration SB 31 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass and be placed on the consent calendar.

Also MR. PRESIDENT:

The Committee on Commerce respectfully reports that it has had under consideration SB 29 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:

29ja

On the printed bill, delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

"Section 1. That chapter 58-16 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Terms used in this Act mean:

(1) "Carrier," a person or an entity that offers or provides a policy, contract, or certificate of group life insurance coverage in this state. Carrier includes an insurer, or any other person or entity providing a policy, contract, or certificate of group life insurance coverage subject to regulation under this title;

(2) "Group-type basis," a benefit plan, other than a salary budget plan utilizing individual insurance policies or subscriber contracts, which meets the following conditions:

(a) Coverage is provided through insurance policies to classes of employees or members defined in terms of conditions pertaining to employment or membership;

(b) The coverage is not available to the general public and can be obtained and maintained only because of the covered person's membership in or connection with the particular organization or group;

(d) There is sponsorship of the plan by the employer, union, or association.

Section 2. That chapter 58-16 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

The provisions of this Act apply to any group life insurance policy issued or provided by a carrier on a group or group-type basis covering persons as employees of employers or as members of unions or associations.

Section 3. That chapter 58-16 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

If a policy or contract subject to the provisions of this Act provides for automatic discontinuance of the policy or contract after a premium or subscription charge has remained unpaid through the grace period allowed for such payment, the carrier is liable for valid claims for covered losses incurred prior to the end of the grace period.

If the actions of the carrier after the end of the grace period indicate that the carrier considers the policy or contract as continuing in force beyond the end of the grace period, such as, by continuing to recognize claims subsequently incurred, the carrier is liable for valid claims for losses beginning prior to the effective date of the written notice of discontinuance to the policyholder or other entity responsible for making payments or submitting subscription charges to the carrier. The effective date of discontinuance may not be prior to midnight at the end of the third scheduled workday after the date upon which the notice is delivered.

Section 4. That chapter 58-16 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

A notice of discontinuance given by the carrier shall include a request to the group policyholder or other entity involved to notify employees covered under the policy of the date as of which the group policy, contract, or certificate will discontinue and to advise that, unless otherwise provided in the policy, contract, or certificate, the carrier is not liable for claims for losses incurred after the date of discontinuance. The notice of discontinuance also shall advise, in any instance in which the plan involves employee contributions, that if the policyholder or other entity continues to collect contributions for the coverage beyond the date of discontinuance, the policyholder or other entity may be held solely liable for the benefits with respect to which the contributions have been collected.

The carrier shall prepare and furnish to the policyholder or other entity at the same time the carrier gives a notice of discontinuance, a supply of, or access to, notice forms to be distributed to the employees or members concerned, indicating the discontinuance and the effective date of the discontinuance, and urging the employees or members to refer to their certificates or contracts in order to determine what rights, if any, are available to them upon the discontinuance.

Section 5. That chapter 58-16 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

Each group policy, contract, or certificate subject to the provisions of this Act, issued on or after the effective date of this Act, or under which the level of benefits is altered, modified, or amended on or after the effective date of this Act, shall provide a reasonable provision for extension of benefits in the event of total disability at the date of discontinuance of the group policy, contract, or certificate as required by this section.

In the case of a group life plan that contains a disability benefit extension of any type, including premium waiver extension, extended death benefit in event of total disability, or payment of income for a specified period during total disability, the discontinuance of the group policy, contract, or certificate may not operate to terminate the extension.

Any applicable extension of benefits or accrued liability shall be described in any policy or contract involved as well as in group insurance certificates. The benefits payable during any period of extension of benefits or accrued liability may be subject to the policy's, contract's, or certificate's regular benefit limits, such as benefits ceasing at exhaustion of a benefit period or of maximum benefits.

Section 6. That chapter 58-16 be amended by adding thereto a NEW SECTION to read as follows:

The following provisions dictate the responsibility of the prior carrier and succeeding carrier when coverage is discontinued:

(1) After discontinuance of the policy, contract, or certificate, the prior carrier remains liable only to the extent of its accrued liabilities and extensions of benefits. The position of the prior carrier shall be the same whether the group policyholder or other entity secures replacement coverage from a new carrier, self-insures, or foregoes the provision of coverage;

(2) If the individual was validly covered under the prior plan on the date of discontinuance, each individual who is eligible for coverage in accordance with the succeeding carrier's plan of benefits is, with respect to the class or classes of individuals, eligible and shall be covered under the succeeding carrier's plan if (a) any actively-at-work and nonconfinement rules are met, and (b) if required by the succeeding carrier, the individual requests enrollment;

(3) Each person not covered under the succeeding carrier's plan of benefits in accordance with subdivision (2) shall nevertheless be covered by the succeeding carrier in accordance with the following rules if the individual was validly covered, including benefit extension, under the prior plan on the date of discontinuance and if the individual is a member of the class or classes of individuals eligible for coverage under the succeeding carrier's plan. Any reference in the following subdivisions to an individual who was or was not totally disabled is a reference to the individual's status immediately prior to the date the succeeding carrier's coverage becomes effective;

(4) The minimum level of benefits to be provided by the succeeding carrier shall be the applicable level of benefits of the prior carrier's plan reduced by any benefits payable by the prior plan;

(5) Coverage shall be provided by the succeeding carrier until the earliest of the following dates:

(a) The date the individual becomes eligible under the succeeding carrier's plan as described in subdivision (1);

(b) The date the individual's coverage would terminate in accordance with the succeeding carrier's plan provisions applicable to individual termination of coverage, such as at termination of employment or ceasing to be an eligible dependent; or

(c) In the case of an individual who was totally disabled, and in the case of a type of coverage for which section 5 of this Act requires an extension of benefits or accrued liability, the end of any period of extension benefits or accrued liability that is required of the prior carrier by section 5 of this Act, or if the prior carrier's policy, contract, or certificate is not subject to that section, but would have been required of the prior carrier had the policy, contract, or certificate been subject to section 5 of this Act at the time the prior carrier's plan was discontinued and replaced by the succeeding carrier's plan;

(6) In any situation in which a determination of the prior carrier's benefit is required by the succeeding carrier, at the succeeding carrier's request the prior carrier shall furnish a statement of the benefits available or pertinent information, sufficient to permit verification of the benefit determination or the determination itself by the succeeding carrier. For the purposes of this subdivision, benefits of the prior plan shall be determined in accordance with all of the definitions, conditions, and covered expense provisions of the prior plan rather than those of the succeeding plan. The benefit determination shall be made as if coverage had not been replaced by the succeeding carrier;

(7) A succeeding carrier's policy may contain a provision limiting benefits to employees who are actively at work. However, for any individual, who remains as an employee, was covered by the prior carrier, and was disabled as of the date the succeeding carrier coverage became effective for that employer, will continue to be covered by the prior carrier as long as the individual remains an employee. An individual who is not disabled and is not at work on the date the succeeding carrier's coverage commences is considered actively at work as long as the absence from work is an employer-approved absence."

29jta

On page 1, line 1, of the printed bill, after "replacement" insert "or discontinuance".

And that as so amended said bill do pass.

Respectfully submitted,
Russell Olson, Chair

Also MR. PRESIDENT:

The Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources respectfully reports that it has had under consideration SB 1 and 69 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bills do pass.

Also MR. PRESIDENT:

The Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources respectfully reports that it has had under consideration SB 51 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass and be placed on the consent calendar.

Also MR. PRESIDENT:

The Committee on Agriculture and Natural Resources respectfully reports that it has had under consideration SB 2 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:

2tb

On page 1, line 10, of the printed bill, overstrike "Up".

On page 1, line 11, delete " one thousand ".

On page 1, overstrike lines 11 to 13, inclusive.

On page 1, line 14, delete " one ".

On page 1, overstrike line 14.

On page 2, line 1, delete " thousand ".

On page 2, overstrike lines 1 to 3, inclusive.

On page 2, line 4, overstrike everything before "fall" and insert " The rules may allocate the number of licenses to be used in specific counties or specified regions or units. The ".

2ttb

On page 1, line 1, of the printed bill, after "number" insert "and method of allocation".

And that as so amended said bill do pass.