The prayer was offered by the Chaplain, Fr. Ron Garry, followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance led by House pages Katie Hauser and Shikar Kumar.
Roll Call: All members present except Reps. Carson, Marty, McPherson, and Otten who
were excused.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that the Chief Clerk of the
House has had under consideration the House Journal of the twenty-second day.
All errors, typographical or otherwise, are duly marked in the temporary journal for
correction.
And we hereby move the adoption of the report.
The House Committee on Appropriations respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1176 which was tabled.
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The House Committee on Appropriations respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1111, 1158, and 1180 which were deferred to the 41st Legislative Day.
The Joint Committee on Appropriations respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1202 which was tabled.
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1072 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
" Section 20. That chapter 23-7 be amended by adding a NEW SECTION to read:
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1074 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
"
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1141 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
"
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1165 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on State Affairs respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1182 which was deferred to the 41st Legislative Day.
The Committee on Education respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1184 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass.
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on Education respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1196 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
" Section 1. That chapter 13-32 be amended by adding a NEW SECTION to read:
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1211 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass and be placed on
the consent calendar.
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1143 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1155 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended as follows:
"
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on Judiciary respectfully reports that it has had under consideration
HB 1108 and 1203 which were deferred to the 41st Legislative Day.
The Committee on Commerce and Energy respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1107 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill do pass.
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on Commerce and Energy respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1090 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended
as follows:
"
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on Commerce and Energy respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1092 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended
as follows:
Also MR. SPEAKER:
The Committee on Commerce and Energy respectfully reports that it has had under
consideration HB 1175 and returns the same with the recommendation that said bill be amended
as follows:
" Section 1. That § 21-1-13.1 be amended to read:
21-1-13.1. Any person who is entitled to recover damages, whether in the principal action or by counterclaim, cross claim, or third-party claim, is entitled to recover interest thereon from the day that the loss or damage occurred, except during such time as the debtor is prevented by law, or by act of the creditor, from paying the debt. Prejudgment interest is not recoverable on future damages, punitive damages, or intangible damages such as pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of consortium, injury to credit, reputation or financial standing, loss of enjoyment of life, or loss of society and companionship. If there is a question of fact as to when the loss or damage occurred, prejudgment interest shall commence on the date specified in the verdict or decision and shall run to, and include, the date of the verdict or, if there is no verdict, the date the judgment is entered. If necessary, special interrogatories shall be submitted to the jury.
Prejudgment interest on damages arising from a contract shall be at the contract rate, if so
provided in the contract; otherwise, if prejudgment interest is awarded, it shall be at the
Category B rate of interest specified in § 54-3-16 a rate equal to three percent plus the prime rate
as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, as published in
statistical release H. 15 or any publication that may supersede it on the day the judgment is
entered. Prejudgment interest on damages arising from inverse condemnation actions shall be
at the Category A rate of interest as specified by § 54-3-16 on the day judgment is entered. This
section shall apply retroactively to the day the loss or damage occurred in any pending action
for inverse condemnation. The court shall compute and award the interest provided in this
section and shall include such interest in the judgment in the same manner as it taxes costs. "
I have the honor to return herewith HB 1055 which has passed the Senate without change.
I have the honor to transmit herewith SB 113 which has passed the Senate and your
favorable consideration is respectfully requested.
Rep. Howard requested a fiscal note on HB 1130.
Which request was supported.
Rep. Qualm moved that when we adjourn today, we adjourn to convene at 1:00 p.m. on
Thursday, February 16, the 24th legislative day.
Which motion prevailed.
Rep. Qualm moved that the report of the Standing Committee on
Transportation on HB 1124 as found on page 383 of the House Journal be adopted.
Which motion prevailed.
The following bill was read on February 14, and today the Speaker assigned this bill to
committee.
SB 75 was referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
SB 113: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to require certain provisions to be met before
distribution of the 911 emergency surcharge revenue and to revise the effective date for the
sunset clause provisions that lower the 911 emergency surcharge and revise the method of
distributing funds.
Was read the first time and referred to the Committee on Transportation.
HB 1174: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise certain provisions concerning how
stop lamps shall be mounted and displayed on vehicles and trailers.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1174 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 64, Nays 0, Excused 6, Absent 0
Excused:
Beal; Carson; Marty; McPherson; Otten (Herman); Peterson (Kent)
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
SB 46: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise certain provisions regarding the state
geologist.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall SB 46 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 64, Nays 0, Excused 6, Absent 0
Yeas:
Ahlers; Anderson; Bartels; Bartling; Bordeaux; Brunner; Campbell; Chase; Clark; Conzet;
Dennert; DiSanto; Duvall; Frye-Mueller; Glanzer; Goodwin; Gosch; Greenfield (Lana); Haggar;
Haugaard; Hawley; Heinemann; Holmes; Howard; Hunhoff; Jamison; Jensen (Kevin); Johns;
Johnson; Kaiser; Karr; Kettwig; Lake; Latterell; Lesmeister; Livermont; Lust; May; McCleerey;
Mills; Peterson (Sue); Pischke; Qualm; Rasmussen; Reed; Rhoden; Ring; Rounds; Rozum;
Schaefer; Schoenfish; Smith; Soli; Steinhauer; Stevens; Tieszen; Tulson; Turbiville; Wiese;
Willadsen; Wismer; York; Zikmund; Speaker Mickelson
Excused:
Beal; Carson; Marty; McPherson; Otten (Herman); Peterson (Kent)
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
HB 1085: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise certain provisions concerning the
occupational tax imposed by business improvement districts.
Having had its second reading was up for consideration and final passage.
The question now being on Rep. Lust's pending motion to amend HB 1085 as found on
page 377 of the House Journal.
Which motion prevailed.
" Section 2. That § 9-55-5 be amended to read:
9-55-5. The mayor shall, with the approval of the governing body, appoint a business
improvement board consisting of property owners, residents, business operators or users of
space within the business area to be improved. If a business improvement district only consists
of hotel and motel properties, the business improvement board shall consist only of hotel and
motel owners, or an owner's designee, with rooms available for lodging within the business
improvement district. The governing body shall, by resolution, designate the boundaries of the
business area prior to the time of the appointment of the board. The board shall make
recommendations to the governing body for the establishment of a plan or plans for
improvements in the business area. If the improvements to be included in one business area
offer benefits that cannot be equitably assessed together under this chapter, more than one
business improvement district as part of the same development plan for that business area may
be proposed. The board may make recommendations to the municipality as to the use of any
revenue collected pursuant to § 9-55-2. ".
The question being "Shall HB 1085 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 28, Nays 38, Excused 4, Absent 0
Nays:
Ahlers; Anderson; Bartels; Beal; Bordeaux; Brunner; Campbell; Dennert; DiSanto; Frye-Mueller; Glanzer; Goodwin; Gosch; Greenfield (Lana); Haggar; Haugaard; Heinemann;
Howard; Jamison; Jensen (Kevin); Kaiser; Karr; Latterell; Lesmeister; Livermont; McCleerey;
Peterson (Kent); Peterson (Sue); Pischke; Qualm; Rasmussen; Rhoden; Rounds; Smith; Soli;
Wiese; Zikmund; Speaker Mickelson
Excused:
Carson; Marty; McPherson; Otten (Herman)
So the bill not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill lost.
HB 1079: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to clarify certain provisions regarding
municipal assessments and the collection of delinquent fees by the county.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1079 pass as amended?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 20, Nays 46, Excused 4, Absent 0
Yeas:
Ahlers; Anderson; Conzet; Gosch; Hawley; Holmes; Hunhoff; Jamison; Johns; Johnson; Reed;
Ring; Schoenfish; Smith; Soli; Stevens; Tieszen; Turbiville; Wiese; Willadsen
Nays:
Bartels; Bartling; Beal; Bordeaux; Brunner; Campbell; Chase; Clark; Dennert; DiSanto; Duvall;
Frye-Mueller; Glanzer; Goodwin; Greenfield (Lana); Haggar; Haugaard; Heinemann; Howard;
Jensen (Kevin); Kaiser; Karr; Kettwig; Lake; Latterell; Lesmeister; Livermont; Lust; May;
McCleerey; Mills; Peterson (Kent); Peterson (Sue); Pischke; Qualm; Rasmussen; Rhoden;
Rounds; Rozum; Schaefer; Steinhauer; Tulson; Wismer; York; Zikmund; Speaker Mickelson
Excused:
Carson; Marty; McPherson; Otten (Herman)
So the bill not having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill lost.
Was read the second time.
The question being "Shall HB 1116 pass?"
And the roll being called:
Yeas 60, Nays 6, Excused 4, Absent 0
Yeas:
Ahlers; Anderson; Bartels; Bartling; Beal; Bordeaux; Brunner; Campbell; Chase; Clark; Conzet;
Dennert; DiSanto; Duvall; Frye-Mueller; Glanzer; Gosch; Haggar; Haugaard; Hawley;
Heinemann; Holmes; Howard; Hunhoff; Jamison; Jensen (Kevin); Johns; Johnson; Kaiser;
Karr; Kettwig; Lake; Latterell; Lesmeister; May; McCleerey; Mills; Peterson (Kent); Pischke;
Qualm; Rasmussen; Reed; Rhoden; Ring; Rounds; Schaefer; Schoenfish; Smith; Soli;
Steinhauer; Stevens; Tieszen; Tulson; Turbiville; Wiese; Willadsen; Wismer; York; Zikmund;
Speaker Mickelson
Nays:
Goodwin; Greenfield (Lana); Livermont; Lust; Peterson (Sue); Rozum
Excused:
Carson; Marty; McPherson; Otten (Herman)
So the bill having received an affirmative vote of a majority of the members-elect, the
Speaker declared the bill passed and the title was agreed to.
Rep. Qualm moved that the balance of the calendar including HB 1191, 1106, 1168, 1063,
1149, 1159, 1010, 1117, 1133, 1170, and 1179 and SB 14, 15, 17, 18, 1, 44, 49, 6, 59, 34, 63,
7, 19, 36, 69, and 70 be deferred to Thursday, February 16, the 24th legislative day.
Which motion prevailed.
There being no objection, the House reverted to Order of Business No. 5.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that HB 1023, 1027, 1029, 1030, 1040, 1062, and 1070 were delivered to his Excellency, the Governor, for his approval at 10:25 a.m., February 15, 2017.
The Committee on Legislative Procedure respectfully reports that the Office of Engrossing
and Enrolling has carefully compared HB 1055 and finds the same correctly enrolled.
The Speaker publicly read the title to
HB 1055: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to revise certain provisions regarding the
need for a driver license or permit to operate certain motor vehicles.
SB 61: FOR AN ACT ENTITLED, An Act to update, revise, and repeal certain provisions
relating to nurse practitioners and nurse midwives.
And signed the same in the presence of the House.
HC 1015 Introduced by: Representatives Rounds, Ahlers, Anderson, Bartels, Bartling,
Beal, Bordeaux, Brunner, Campbell, Chase, Clark, Conzet, Dennert, DiSanto, Duvall, Frye-Mueller, Glanzer, Goodwin, Gosch, Greenfield (Lana), Haggar, Haugaard, Hawley, Heinemann,
Holmes, Howard, Hunhoff, Jamison, Jensen (Kevin), Johns, Johnson, Kaiser, Karr, Kettwig,
Lake, Latterell, Lesmeister, Livermont, Lust, Marty, May, McCleerey, McPherson, Mickelson,
Mills, Otten (Herman), Peterson (Kent), Peterson (Sue), Pischke, Qualm, Rasmussen, Reed,
Rhoden, Ring, Rozum, Schaefer, Schoenfish, Smith, Soli, Steinhauer, Stevens, Tieszen, Tulson,
Turbiville, Wiese, Willadsen, Wismer, York, and Zikmund and Senators Monroe, Bolin,
Cammack, Cronin, Curd, Ewing, Frerichs, Greenfield (Brock), Haverly, Heinert, Jensen (Phil),
Kennedy, Killer, Klumb, Kolbeck, Langer, Maher, Nelson, Nesiba, Netherton, Novstrup, Otten
(Ernie), Partridge, Peters, Rusch, Russell, Soholt, Solano, Stalzer, Sutton, Tapio, Tidemann,
White, Wiik, and Youngberg
Rep. Beal moved that the House do now adjourn, which motion prevailed and at 3:23 p.m.
the House adjourned.